Ends where it ought to start
Hawtrey and Keynes moving apart rapidly
over methods or remedy
That a second tier sort like H gets pushed
forward today
as a mind for our time
Suggests just how deeply " the monetary first " caucus
Has come to occupy
the front bench of the macro activist party
What a misfortune for the job class
back to that vintage debate
setting:
The long post great war pre great depression stag economy of Britain
Unemployeds at levels much like here and now
H blames the interest rate
K does not question that
But sez "can't be helped "
not If the gold pledge is to be defended
Of course the gold pledge ended up going up the spout
with the on set of great depression conditions
but reviving this debate seems to imply
we as they...keyes and hawtrey
share a notion of price level dynamics in the abstract
In a uniform currency closed system
But then emerges
a vaguely conflicting view of the interactions of various national price levels
all Sharing a gold pledge
H suggests you let gold flow out
In expectation of reactive acceleration of ROW credit expansion
And consequently
a faster ROW price level rise
But then there's the tendency among central bankers ever vigilant to preserve price stability
to counter gold in flows with a sterilization eh ?
H in the up shot
Simply asserts the best possible ROW reaction for britain
an outflow of British gold might ...might produce:
a large ROW credit expansion
and something quite like this would be the necessary reaction
but
When it's only a possible reaction......
and
An examination of the historic record suggests
The likely hood in a time like the late twenties
When hawtrey is pushing this line
The outcome might well be
" sterilization "
by ROW central bank gold in takers
with this drain of gold into invisible coffers
Culminating in a payments crisis in Britain
as we know and Fortunately
the events of 29 and 30 obviated all this
And we got the final death rattle of the full force global gold standard