Wednesday, October 31, 2012

an exchange on mitt's han jeep jump whopper

pgl said...
Ah c'mon. Why is this news? Romney has lied about EVERYTHING. Don't you know he is running for LIAR IN CHIEF?

Paine said in reply to pgl...
I'm surprised at you pro growth
Here I must play the popular front defender of our bourgeois liberal institutions
Romney has campaigned as if to prove explicitly
The media can not stop a well funded all fronts assault on the objective truth
Yes I know the so called objective truth is such a bourgeois shibboleth
But surely this campaign if it succeeds
Will pave the way to..all future campaigns
Once a candidate loses fear of the media
so long as he or she retains ample donors
able to buy up adequate air time and space on this very same media

The challenge here is to the old elite channels of the news
Mitt has said to them
Fuck u

Paine said in reply to Paine...
Yes the little bush big Chaney gang
had the essence of this on board
With their
" we are the makers of reality not it's observers "
meme
Now this campaign certifies the new politics
The genteel old broadcasting networks and big city daily outfits
With their confected objectivity in reportage
Is impudently insolently slapped in the face
Literally every day by the mitt band wagon

Paine said in reply to Paine...
Ya the old jags derseve no beter
But it's the American little guys white as well as rain bowed
that will take the shot to the chops here

Paine said in reply to Paine...
I recall the media bringing down nixon
And I recall the media " deciding" to accept Reagan
But now the arrogant sclerotic bastards are getting cuffed around like parlor pets

                   

Paine said in reply to SomeCallMeTim...
Blaming the white uneducated low info electorate is silly
The liberal guardians of these narrow minded warped fools
And all their. Sacred " rights" and exceptional" prosperity"
The big media
are failing to protect them from this vulture

jonathan said...
Have you thought about this in terms of market theories?
One idea is that there is a marketplace for information and that more players, more information not only generates more "information" but acts as a corrective which encourages better information. This is a version of the idea that markets are beneficial; it takes the idea of market optimization and adds to it the kind of qualitative outcome proponents of market theories say are the natural result.
In contrast there is the idea that bad drives out good. Advertising for false medical remedies didn't go away until they were regulated, etc.
Looking at what's been happening, it looks like political advertising is more like medical remedies than what proponents of markets hope. There is a benefit in lying. Or at least a perceived benefit in lying and that's what counts. Lose the election and lie again the next time.
I'm going to remember how this has evolved whenever anyone says we should rely on markets to achieve an optimal result. We may want a result but that doesn't mean markets will generate what we want. This was the old rationale for regulation: unchecked, markets go their own way and that can be bad because markets generate outcomes that are optimal only in the sense they are generated by the market.

Paine said in reply to jonathan...
The old media giants provided de facto regulations
Yes within broad margins
Used for Madison avenue as well
But this is medicine show stuff
Without a sheriff to run em out of the county

denim said...
I hear that God is on our side, those of us who work righteousness. Acts 10:34:
"Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and works righteousness, is accepted with him."
And for lying politicians of any ilk, Psalm 50:
"...14 Sacrifice thank offerings to God, fulfill your vows to the Most High, 15 and call upon me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you will honor me.” 16 But to the wicked, God says: “What right have you to recite my laws or take my covenant on your lips? 17 You hate my instruction and cast my words behind you. 18 When you see a thief, you join with him; you throw in your lot with adulterers. 19 You use your mouth for evil and harness your tongue to deceit. 20 You speak continually against your brother and slander your own mother’s son. 21 These things you have done and I kept silent; you thought I was altogether like you. 14 Sacrifice thank offerings to God, fulfill your vows to the Most High, 15 and call upon me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you will honor me.” 16 But to the wicked, God says: “What right have you to recite my laws or take my covenant on your lips? 17 You hate my instruction and cast my words behind you. 18 When you see a thief, you join with him; you throw in your lot with adulterers. 19 You use your mouth for evil and harness your tongue to deceit. 20 You speak continually against your brother and slander your own mother’s son. 21 These things you have done and I kept silent; you thought I was altogether like you. But I will rebuke you and accuse you to your face."
"These things you have done and I kept silent; you thought I was altogether like you. But I will rebuke you and accuse you to your face."
If looks could stop a clock,
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10/romney-says-hes-winning-its-a-bluff.html

                   
                   
                   

 

Dave said...
My only quibble with this premise: We've never had a "truth" era in US politics, so we can't have a "post-truth" era. Pick a supposed idyllic time when men were real men, and I'll give you a completely outrageously wrong political lie that formed the centerpiece of a party agenda.

Paine said in reply to Dave...
Come now surely we can discuss degree changes
And surely as a system heats up it goes thru qualitative changes
Might we not have seen red hot lies final boil off the water in the pan here ?

Isn't this like global warming leading to climate change
And like climate change
Given the gravity of change
Imagine a completely impotent media
unable to mediate and moderate
the adversarial exchanges
It's certainly a conjecture one ought to consider thrusts the burden of proof on the rejection side

Oupoot said...
Only in the US. Freedom of speech is critical for democracy and should be protected. But most civilised countries have placed limits to this right precisely so that they remain civilised.

 

Mano Philips said...
My comment on Dana Milbank's Washington Post column
"Romney goes off-road with the truth"
The Elephant in the Room

It was Romney who shipped thousands of Auto jobs to China; why is MSM silent on this.

Investigative Reporter Greg Palast on Truthout

"The truth? On June 1, 2009, the Obama administration announced that Detroit Piston's owner Tom Gores, GM and the US Treasury would buy back Delphi.The plan called for saving 15 of 29 Delphi factories in the US. Then the vulture funds pounced. The Nation discovered that, in the two weeks immediately following the announcement of the Delphi jobs-saving plan, Paul Singer, Romney's partner, secretly bought up over a billion dollars of old Delphi bonds for pennies on the dollar. Singer and partners now controlled the company - and killed the return of Delphi to GM. These facts were revealed in a sworn deposition of Delphi's Chief Financial Officer John Sheehan, confidential, but now released on the Web. Sheehan said, under oath, that these speculators threatened to withhold key parts (steering columns), from GM. This would have brought the auto maker to its knees, immediately forcing GM's permanent closure. The extortion worked. The government money that was supposed to go to save jobs went to Singer's hedge fund, Elliott Management Corporation and its partners, including the Romneys. Once Singer's crew took control of Delphi, they rapidly completed the move to China, sticking the US taxpayers with the bill for the pensions of the Delphi workers cut loose. Dan Loeb, a million-dollar donor to the GOP, who made three-quarters of a billion dollars off the legal scam, proudly announced that, once he and Elliott took control, Delphi kept "virtually no North American unionized labor." In all, three hedge funds run by Romney's million-dollar donors have pocketed $4.2 billion, a return on their "investment" of over 3,000 percent - all care of the US taxpayer. The Romneys personally earned a minimum of $15.3 million, though more likely $115 million - a range their campaign does not dispute.

Please see these:

Delphi Workers - Greg Palast - http://www.gregpalast.com/how-mitt-romney-profited-from-delphi-workers-misery/ Truthout - http://truth-out.org/progressivepicks/item/12273-romney-company-shipped-every-single-delphi-uaw-job-to-china The Nation - Romney's Bailout Bonanza - http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza#

Paine said in reply to Mano Philips...
The tale here may be off some
But we have entered a period where something this enormous is too easily believed
By the educated liberal elite
We have no grand media guardians out there exposing this utterly grotesque activity
Once the large privately owned national media outfits are utterly impotent
Unable to enforce at least some measure of veracity and transparency
On the waring parties
The formal freedom of the press
Becomes completely irrelevant
And the illusion of truths media based guardianship
this formal freedom may sustain
Becomes more dangerous then a totally controled
1984 type state press

Paine said in reply to Paine...
It's always been the case a liar can simply replace one lie with the next
It's only if the media brands a serial liar just that
A serial liar
Not as opinion but as news
"Serial liar mitt Romney today said"
in the lede
As in serial killer ted bundy got labeled a serial killer
The big media has to call Romney out
Or it loses it's power to protect the low info citizen majority
Reality is a social construction
Right now the feckless big corporate press is failing it's chief mission

Yes the era of McCarthy saw serial liars abound
they were finally reigned in only years later and with the usual long half life
Here the consequence of mitt winning could last many political cycles
Perhaps this new era of info nets
Requires the old info net to fall flat on it's face
As part of the transition
If so let us hope the new info system quickly self organizes the corral within which a workable connection to the facts is maintained again

save_the_rustbelt said...
Stayed in my Toledo condo last night, a few miles from the Jeep plant.
Chrysler Jeep has in the past (until 2009) and will likely in the future produce Jeeps in China. The only promise by Marchionne (SP?) is that current Wrangler production will not be moved overseas.
The (Toledo) Blade has done better journalism on this than the national media.

Paine said in reply to save_the_rustbelt...
Rusty
Come on
The story is as big as big as Paul bunion
But it's standing on size 2 fact feet
If mitt is just play politics as usual
I've been asleep my whole life
Nixon would never dare to pull stunts like
The Romney campaign pulls day after day

Paine said in reply to Paine...
Nixon hated the press but he feared it
Mitt has contempt for the press and gaffs at it

Paine said in reply to Paine...
Here I mean the press as guardian of a de facto set of game rules on fact telling
The stretch limits and frequency ceilings in other words

Paine said in reply to Paine...
Oh go ahead rusty vote mitt
The rust belt is in for a big scrub off
Now starting plant floor wages are half what they once were

Paine said in reply to Paine...
However the spontaneous rate of re industrialization for some time
will remain below the rate of deindustrialization
Only an overt and massive industrial program funded and directed from Washington can get our production platform back up to 1946 type global status