Sunday, April 29, 2012

each of the sub intervals has its own story line


Table 1Table 1 (continued)

Reconciling growth in median hourly compensation and productivity, 1973–2011

1973–791979–951995–002000–111973–11
A. Basic trends (annual growth)
Median hourly wage-0.26-0.151.500.050.10
Median hourly compensation0.56-0.171.130.350.27
Average hourly compensation0.590.552.100.950.87
Productivity1.081.292.331.881.56
Productivity-median compensation gap0.521.461.211.531.30
B. Explanatory factors (percentage-point contribution to gap)
Inequality of compensation0.020.720.970.590.61
Shifts in labor's share of income0.030.23-0.400.690.25
Divergence of consumer and output prices0.460.510.640.240.44
Total0.521.461.221.521.29
C. Explanatory factors (percent contribution to gap)
Inequality of compensation4.8%49.6%80.0%38.9%46.9%
Shifts in labor's share of income5.5%15.4%-32.5%45.3%19.0%
Divergence of consumer and output prices89.7%35.0%52.5%15.8%34.0%
Total100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



73-79

cost of living change
out stripped productivity and wage change


79-95
triple crown


inequality of compensation

  wage share and cost of living outstripping general labor productivity growth


95-00

golden years
for compensation share
recovers most of lost ground

but inequality of compensation grew rapidly
and the cost of living versus average labor productivity
saw COL in acclerated outstripping


00-11

another triple crown era
with very strong wage share loss

-----------------------

note i'd like to see the 79-95 sub  interval
to say

79-86

and
86- 95
ie
split at about the time the plaza accords of  86
 cut in
and then alan greenstain  took the fed helm